|
|
Chris Huff <chr### [at] maccom> wrote:
: Not only would it take less keywords, but it would be more flexible and
: nearly as easy to use.(easier in some situations)
If you want to use less keywords you'll have to remember the numbers. If
you want the numbers declared as easy-to-remember identifiers, then you
actually have one keyword more than in the one-function-per-type case. :)
--
main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
):_;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/
Post a reply to this message
|
|